查看原文
其他

《World Development》|Acosta et al:城市邻近性对公共区域集体行动的中介效应: 来自中国得理论与实证

摘要靠近城市中心的村庄通常经济增长更快,农业条件与福利更好。然而,很少有研究将村庄的城市邻近性与公地治理联系起来。本文采用有序probit模型、逐步回归和Sobel-Goodman中介检验等方法,利用中国27个省306个县1257个村庄的调查数据,探讨了城市邻近性对灌溉公地的影响。研究发现,农村与省级经济中心的距离对灌溉公地的集体行动有直接的正向影响,这可能是由于农民受到农业集约化的激励。靠近市场中心的村庄,农业更加商业化,这激励了农民参与集体行动,以获得维护灌溉公地的利益。研究还发现,村庄与省级经济中心的邻近性通过村庄地形、人口和集体收入的中介作用增加了灌溉集体行动。该结果丰富了公共研究领域,并暗示在制定乡村振兴政策、推进城市化进程和实现可持续发展目标时,应考虑与经济中心的距离。


关键词:城市临近性;乡村振兴;公共灌溉;集体行动;中国


Abstract:Villages closer to urban centers often have higher economic growth, better agricultural conditions and better welfare outcomes. However, few studies have linked villages’ proximity to urban centers with governance of the commons. In this paper, we explore the effects of urban proximity on the irrigation commons using ordered probit models, stepwise regression and the Sobel-Goodman mediation test, with survey data from 1257 villages in 306 counties and 27 provinces across China. We find that villages’ proximity to provincial economic centers has a direct and positive effect on collective action in the irrigation commons, which could be attributed to farmers’ incentives for agricultural intensification. Agriculture in villages closer to market centers is more commercially oriented, which gives farmers incentives to participate in collective action to reap the benefits of maintaining the irrigation commons. We also find that proximity between the village and the provincial economic center increases irrigation collective action through the mediated effects of village topography, population and collective income. The results enrich the literature of commons study and imply that distance to the economic center should be considered in policy making for rural revitalization and implementation of the New Urban Agenda as well as the Sustainable Development Goals.


Key words:Urban proximityRural revitalizationIrrigation commonsCollective actionChina





《World Development》最新影响因子为3.92,该期刊是发展经济学领域的顶级学术期刊,在JCR分区中处于经济学领域一区(Q1),属于经济学影响因子前5%期刊。 


原文链接:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X21000565?via%3Dihub


●《AE》|商品作物生产者和特种作物生产者的风险偏好:前景理论的应用

《JRS》|Penghui et al:农田景观破碎化演化及其从农村到城市的驱动机制——以常州市为例

●《ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS》| Li et al:非正式制度与草原保护:来自中国牧区的经验证据

●《AE》| Wang et al:COVID-19 对中国农村人口的健康、经济和社会影响

●《中国人口·资源与环境(英文版)》| Fan et al:畜禽养殖污染对健康风险的影响:来自中国农村生猪养殖案例的实证

●《中国农村观察》城乡居民医保一体化政策缓解了健康不平等吗?——来自中国地级市准自然实验的经验证据

●《JAE》| Ding et al:中国农民对降水上升趋势的时间贴现及其影响

●《AER》| Beaman et al:基于网络理论的目标定位能促进技术的采用吗?

●《JRS》| Zhang et al:农村转型对面源污染的影响研究—基于对中国传统农区的综合性分析


————EN

您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存